Camacho v. Texas Workforce Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
408 F.3d 229 (2005)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
To receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Family (TANF) grants, states must ensure that certain recipients participate in “work activities,” defined by 42 U.S.C. § 607 to include unsubsidized employment and job-search and job-readiness assistance, among other enumerated categories. If an individual refused to participate in work activity, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) required the state to reduce the amount of a family’s assistance or otherwise terminate assistance. A recipient could also lose Medicaid benefits for refusing to work. After the Texas legislature passed legislation implementing the PRWORA requirements, the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) (defendant) promulgated implementing rules that defined individuals participating in work for purposes of § 607 to include those who engaged in all TANF core and noncore activities. TANF core activities included job-search and job-readiness assistance, which TWC defined to encompass a recipient’s maintenance of their children’s health and dental checkups, immunizations, and school attendance and the recipient’s avoidance of using illicit substances. If a recipient failed to ensure these things for the recipient’s children, the recipient’s medical assistance could be terminated. Soila Camacho (plaintiff) filed suit, arguing that failing to ensure child immunization, checkups, and school attendance and avoid substance abuse could not reasonably be interpreted as components of job-search and job-readiness assistance activities. TWC contended that recipients with children in good health and attending school and recipients who refrain from substance abuse are more likely to get and maintain jobs. The district court found in Camacho’s favor. TWC appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Garza, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.