From our private database of 32,100+ case briefs...
Carbonaro v. Johns-Manville Corp.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
526 F. Supp. 260 (1981)
In 1979, multiple workers (plaintiffs) sued multiple manufacturers—including Owens-Corning Fiberglas (defendant)—in state court in Pennsylvania to recover damages for contracting various asbestos-induced lung diseases after being exposed to asbestos because of the manufacturers’ alleged misdeeds and negligence. In January 1981, the manufacturers filed motions for summary judgment on the grounds that the action was time-barred by the statute of limitations. Rather than oppose the summary judgment motions, the workers filed a separate lawsuit against the same manufacturers in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and added claims for transverse-colon cancers. In May 1981, judgment was entered for all the manufacturers in the state-court action. Thereafter, the manufacturers asked the federal district court to dismiss that action on res judicata (claim preclusion) grounds. The workers opposed the motion and argued that because they alleged admiralty jurisdiction, the doctrine of laches and not limitations controlled and their current cancer claims were not discoverable at the time of the state-court action, nor were they grounds for the limitations’ dismissal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Giles, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 582,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 582,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.