Logourl black

Carmody v. Toll Brothers, Inc.

Delaware Court of Chancery
723 A.2d 1180 (1998)


Toll Brothers, Inc. concluded in the late 1990s that it had become an attractive takeover candidate. In June 1997, the company adopted a poison pill defense plan (the Rights Plan). Toll Brothers was not facing a specific threat, but stated that it wanted to protect its shareholders from coercive or unfair tactics that might accompany a takeover bid. The Rights Plan granted options to all shareholders that would trigger the dilution of the company’s stock if any acquiror obtained or made a tender offer to obtain 15 percent of Toll Brothers’ stock. The Rights Plan was accompanied by a dead hand provision, which stated that the Rights Plan could not be redeemed by anyone other than the current board members or their designated successors. Toll Brothers’ certificate of incorporation did provide that directors may have varying degrees of voting authority. A Toll Brothers shareholder (plaintiff) sued the company and its board members, arguing that the dead hand provision unlawfully restricted the power of future boards and was therefore invalid as ultra vires. The shareholder claimed in the alternative that the directors breached their duty of loyalty by approving the dead hand provision because it violated the Blasius rule and the Unocal test. The board members moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 92,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,498 briefs - keyed to 168 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now