Carson v. Makin
United States Supreme Court
142 S. Ct. 1987, 596 U.S. 767 (2022)
- Written by Tiffany Hester, JD
Facts
Maine’s legislature created a tuition-assistance program for families in school districts without public high schools. In this program, parents chose the high school their child was to attend, and the local school district paid that school to subsidize the child’s tuition. To qualify for this program, private schools had to meet two requirements. First, the schools had to have accreditation from the New England Association of Schools and Colleges or a curriculum approved by the Maine Department of Education. Second, schools could not provide religious instruction. David and Amy Carson and Troy and Angela Nelson wanted to send their daughters to Bangor Christian School and Temple Academy, both accredited private religious schools. However, the schools did not qualify for tuition assistance because religious-based instruction was provided. The Carsons and Nelsons (plaintiffs) then sued Pender Makin, the commissioner of the Maine Department of Education (defendant), alleging that the program violated the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause. Maine argued that the program did not violate the Free Exercise Clause because schools were not disqualified based on religious status but on the religious use of public funds. Maine also argued that the state had a compelling antiestablishment interest in preserving the separation of church and state. The district court granted summary judgment to Maine. The First Circuit affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.