Carter v. Welles-Bowen Realty, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
736 F.3d 722 (2013)
- Written by Kathryn Lohmeyer, JD
Facts
The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2607(a), permitted title-services companies to pay certain referral fees within the real-estate-services industry only if three safe-harbor conditions were satisfied. In a policy statement, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (plaintiff) added a fourth safe-harbor condition. Subsequently, real-estate agency Welles-Bowen Realty, Inc. (Welles-Bowen) (defendant) referred Erick Carter and other customers (customers) (plaintiffs) to an affiliated title-services company. The customers filed suit against Welles-Bowen in federal district court, arguing that Welles-Bowen had failed to satisfy the fourth safe-harbor condition. The district court ruled for Welles-Bowen. The customers appealed. HUD intervened, arguing that the policy statement was due Chevron deference as HUD’s reasonable interpretation of RESPA.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sutton, J.)
Concurrence (Sutton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.