Castaneda v. Olsher
California Supreme Court
162 P.3d 610 (2007)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
Ernest Castaneda (plaintiff) was a resident in a mobile-home park owned by George Olsher, Paule Olsher, and P&G Enterprises (defendants). There was a gang confrontation involving a resident of the mobile home across the street from Castaneda’s home. During the confrontation, Castaneda was shot and injured as a bystander. Castaneda sued, arguing that the defendants had a duty to: (1) not rent to known gang members, (2) evict the gang members due to the foreseeability of problems, and (3) hire security guards and maintain brighter lighting. Castaneda presented evidence that the defendants were aware of the gang activity within the mobile-home park. Castaneda also specifically offered evidence that the defendants knew that gang members resided in the home at issue. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for nonsuit. The appeals court reversed this decision. The defendants appealed to the Supreme Court of California.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)
Dissent (Kennard, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.