Castaneda v. Olsher

162 P.3d 610 (2007)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Castaneda v. Olsher

California Supreme Court
162 P.3d 610 (2007)

Facts

Ernest Castaneda (plaintiff) was a resident in a mobile-home park owned by George Olsher, Paule Olsher, and P&G Enterprises (defendants). There was a gang confrontation involving a resident of the mobile home across the street from Castaneda’s home. During the confrontation, Castaneda was shot and injured as a bystander. Castaneda sued, arguing that the defendants had a duty to: (1) not rent to known gang members, (2) evict the gang members due to the foreseeability of problems, and (3) hire security guards and maintain brighter lighting. Castaneda presented evidence that the defendants were aware of the gang activity within the mobile-home park. Castaneda also specifically offered evidence that the defendants knew that gang members resided in the home at issue. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for nonsuit. The appeals court reversed this decision. The defendants appealed to the Supreme Court of California.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)

Dissent (Kennard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership