Center for Democracy and Technology v. Pappert

337 F. Supp. 2d 606 (2004)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Center for Democracy and Technology v. Pappert

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
337 F. Supp. 2d 606 (2004)

Facts

In 2002, Pennsylvania enacted the Internet Child Pornography Act, which required internet-service providers to block users from accessing child pornography using the providers’ services. Internet-service providers had three ways to potentially block such content. First, they could engage in domain-name-system (DNS) filtering, meaning if a user attempted to go to a particular website, the computer would look up the website through a domain name registry to route the internet traffic to the correct internet-protocol (IP) address for that website. With DNS filtering, an internet service provider could block traffic associated with a particular domain name, though this blocked all web content under that domain name, not just single web pages. Second, they could engage in IP filtering, whereby the specific IP address of the web page would be blocked, though this also did not specifically block single web pages. Third, they could engage in URL filtering, whereby specific web URLs were blocked, though this was not technologically feasible at the time for the majority of internet-service providers. The Center for Democracy and Technology (the center) (plaintiff) filed suit against the attorney general, Pappert (defendant) seeking a preliminary injunction, arguing that the act burdened the center’s First Amendment rights.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dubois, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership