Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Chicago Board of Realtors v. City of Chicago

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
819 F.2d 732 (1987)


Facts

The City of Chicago (defendant) passed a law codifying the implied warranty of habitability and creating additional rights for the tenant and responsibilities for the landlord. The law requires that landlords keep security deposits in Illinois banks and pay interest to the tenant on those deposits. The ordinance also permits tenants to withhold rent for violations of the lease by the landlord and deduct the cost of small repairs from rent. The law prohibits landlords from charging more than $10 per month for late rent, no matter how much the tenant owes. The law creates a rebuttable presumption that any attempt by a landlord to evict a tenant who has exercised her rights under the law is retaliatory. A group of property owners (plaintiffs) sued in federal district court, arguing that the ordinance was unconstitutional. The plaintiffs asked for a preliminary injunction preventing enforcement of the law during the pendency of the suit. The district court denied the injunction, holding that the property owners did not have a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits. The plaintiffs appealed the denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 169,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.