Chisolm v. Hood
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
133 F. Supp. 2d 894 (2001)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
The Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals (DHH) administered the Medicaid program within the state. Christina Chisolm and others (collectively, Chisolm) (plaintiffs) brought a class-action suit against the secretary of DHH, David Hood (defendant), asserting that federal Medicaid law required the state to provide behavioral and psychological services, rendered by licensed psychologists, to class members with autism. All class members were eligible for Medicaid and were under the age of 21. Chisolm offered unrebutted expert testimony by Dr. Grant Butterbaugh. Butterbaugh testified that (1) psychological or behavioral interventions had been shown to be effective in improving functioning in children with autism; (2) the use of behavioral interventions was essential for teaching most children with autism daily functional skills and for modifying misbehaviors; (3) psychological services could at least mitigate the effects of autism, and for many individuals with autism, the psychological services were a necessary service, for which other services could not substitute; and (4) psychiatrists were generally not trained in, and did not provide, the types of behavioral treatments that had been shown to be effective in treating children with autism.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barbier, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.