City of Albuquerque v. State of New Mexico Municipal Boundary Commission
New Mexico Court of Appeals
131 N.M. 665 (2002)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
The New Mexico legislature established the New Mexico Municipal Boundary Commission (commission) (defendant) as an independent board with the authority to hear petitions from both municipalities seeking to annex new territory and landowners seeking to be annexed by a municipality. Regarding petitions from landowners, as required by statute, the commission held public hearings to determine whether the territory proposed to be annexed was contiguous to the municipality and whether it “may be provided with municipal services.” The annexation had to be approved if these two requirements were met. West Tijeras Canyon Limited (West Tijeras) (defendant) owned land that was contiguous to the border of the City of Albuquerque (plaintiff) and sought annexation into the city mainly to gain access to water and sewer services. West Tijeras first requested that the Albuquerque City Council (council) approve annexation of its land, which the council denied. Subsequently, West Tijeras filed a petition with the commission for annexation. The commission held a hearing on the petition in which the city expressed its opposition. The commission interpreted the requirement that the land “may be provided with municipal services” to mean simply that the city was capable of providing services to the land. The city contended that the forced annexation would put an undue burden on its already strained services, conflict with the county comprehensive plan’s policy for rural areas, and conflict with the city’s infill policy promoting development within existing infrastructure. The commission voted in favor of annexation. The city appealed to the district court, which overturned the annexation. West Tijeras and the commission appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pickard, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.