Clagett v. Dacy
Maryland Court of Special Appeals
420 A.2d 1285 (1980)
- Written by Michael Beverly, JD
Facts
Plaintiffs were the high bidders for a foreclosed property, but the attorneys conducting the sale did not follow the correct procedure and as a result the plaintiffs lost the chance to complete the sale. The attorneys were hired to represent the mortgagee in the sale. The plaintiffs brought suit against the attorneys (defendants), alleging that the attorneys owed the plaintiffs a duty of care in the attorneys’ execution of the sale and that they breached that duty. The Circuit Court for Prince George’s County sustained the attorneys’ demurrer, finding that a duty of care did not exist. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wilner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.