Cody v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.

439 N.E.2d 234 (1982)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cody v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
439 N.E.2d 234 (1982)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD

Facts

William Cody (plaintiff) worked for Sun Oil Company as a trainer of new tractor-trailer drivers. While riding with a driver trainee, the driver lost control of the truck. Cody was severely injured and became unable to work. Cody had purchased an employer-based group disability insurance plan with Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (defendant), and he contributed to the plan through payroll deductions. The plan provided that it would pay totally disabled employees 50 percent of their monthly earnings, up to $5,000 a month. This was subject to two coordination-of-benefits clauses. First, income from other benefits would reduce benefits under the plan. Specifically, benefits would be reduced by 50 percent of the employee’s Social Security benefits as well as amounts from workers’ compensation. Second, if the total amount of benefits the insured received from all benefit sources exceeded 75 percent of the employee’s base monthly earnings, benefits under the policy would be reduced until the sum of all benefits equaled 75 percent of base monthly earnings. Cody never received benefits under the plan and sued for breach of contract. A jury found that Cody was totally disabled from the time he became eligible for benefits through the date of the verdict. The parties stipulated as to the possible damages outcomes, and the damages question was not submitted to the jury. The judge calculated the benefits due to be zero because Cody was entitled to receive 50 percent of his monthly salary less 50 percent of his Social Security benefits less his workers’-compensation benefits. The trial court entered judgment for the insurer. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court granted Cody’s request for direct appellate review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Abrams, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership