From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Coffee v. McDonnell-Douglas Corp.
Supreme Court of California
503 P.2d 1366 (1972)
Before employing Robert Coffee (plaintiff) to fly planes, McDonell-Douglas Corp. required him to undergo a physical exam including x-rays and bloodwork. A doctor at McDonnell-Douglas’s medical clinic performed Coffee’s exam and signed his fit-to-fly form the same day, although his lab results were not back. The doctor told Coffee he was qualified for flight duty, with the understanding that approval would be withdrawn if the x-rays or bloodwork showed negative results, which comported with McDonnell-Douglas’s usual procedure. Meanwhile, Coffee was qualified to fly planes. Coffee’s bloodwork results simply went in his file without review, again pursuant to McDonell’s usual procedure. Had medical personnel reviewed the results, they would have discovered Coffee had bone-marrow cancer. Coffee collapsed after an extended flight seven months later and was diagnosed. He underwent six months of treatment, including blood transfusion and nausea-inducing drug therapy, and contracted hepatitis because of increased susceptibility to infection. Fortunately, the cancer responded well and remitted. However, Coffee sued McDonell-Douglas and three of its doctors (defendants), arguing that they performed the physical examination negligently and knew or should discovered that Coffee had cancer when he was hired. Coffee asserted that diagnosis at that time would have avoided progression and aggravation of the disease, which reduced his life expectancy, lessened his resistance to other diseases, weakened his bones, and caused him to lose wages by taking time off from work. The trial court entered a jury verdict for Coffee. McDonnell-Douglas appealed, asserting it no duty to discover Coffee’s condition.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.