Coleman v. American Red Cross
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
23 F.3d 1091 (1994)
Cheryl Coleman (plaintiff) sued the American Red Cross (Red Cross) (defendant) in a federal district court, alleging she contracted a deadly virus as the result of a blood transfusion from an infected Red Cross donor. Coleman's lawyer wanted to discover the donor's identity in order to win a lucrative settlement or judgment for Coleman and increase his attorney's fee. The Red Cross withheld the donor's identity, fearing that breaching the donor’s privacy could substantially prejudice its ability to attract future donors. The court issued a protective order, requiring the Red Cross to deliver redacted donor records to Coleman, but prohibiting Coleman from using the records to identify the donor. The Red Cross delivered the records to Coleman's lawyer but inadvertently failed to redact some vital information. The lawyer breached the protective order by using that information to discover the donor's identity. When the court learned of this breach it issued an injunction that prohibited Coleman from using the donor's identification for any purpose. Coleman appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The circuit court invalidated the injunction and remanded the case. On remand, the Red Cross contended that violation of the protective order substantially prejudiced the Red Cross’s interests. The district court granted the Red Cross's motion to dismiss Coleman's case, citing Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b) and 41(b), as well as the court's inherent power to impose sanctions for contumacious misconduct. Coleman appealed the dismissal to the circuit court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Guy, J.)
Dissent (Ryan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 709,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 709,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.