Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
765 F.3d 1205 (2014)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Abercrombie and Fitch Co. (Abercrombie) (defendant) built and maintained storefronts for its Hollister chain of stores. Two types of Hollister stores were built in the United States between 1993 and 2010, each with three sets of entrance doors. One type of Hollister store had all three entrances level with the surrounding mall floor, but the other design included a stepped porch for the central set of doors on the storefront. The porch housed mannequins and chairs for customers, and it was given the look of a Southern California surf shack. Patrons entering through the different sets of doors ended up in the same locations, regardless of the store design type. Because wheelchair users could not access the stepped porches, the Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition (coalition) (plaintiff) filed Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) complaints with Abercrombie, but Abercrombie did not alter the porches. The coalition filed suit against Abercrombie for alleged violations of the ADA. The district court granted summary judgment for the coalition, finding that (1) the porch design violated the overarching goals of the ADA and (2) the porch was a space and entrance under the ADA and did not meet the official design standards of the Department of Justice (DOJ). The district court issued a permanent injunction forcing Abercrombie to bring its stores into compliance. Abercrombie appealed to the Tenth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kelly, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (McHugh, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.