Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Patrick Hooker

680 F.3d 194 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Patrick Hooker

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
680 F.3d 194 (2012)

AR

Facts

The New York State Legislature passed the Kosher Act, which required foods with kosher labels to also provide information as to why the seller believed his or her food was kosher. The legislature noted that many people ate kosher foods for other than religious reasons. Plaintiffs sued, arguing that the act was unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause because the law was intended to discriminate against non-Orthodox Jews because consumers could not rely on the kosher label because sellers could label a product “kosher” using any criteria they wanted to use. They also argued that the act was an attempt to impose Orthodox Jewish requirements on sellers of kosher products. The court ruled in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Droney, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership