Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Connick v. Myers

461 U.S. 138 (1983)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Connick v. Myers

United States Supreme Court

461 U.S. 138 (1983)

Play video

Facts

Sheila Myers (plaintiff) was an assistant district attorney employed in New Orleans in the office of Harry Connick, Sr. (defendant), the New Orleans District Attorney. Connick told Myers that she would be transferred to prosecute cases in a different area of the criminal court. Myers opposed this transfer, and expressed her view to Connick and other supervisors. When told that her views were not shared by other employees, Myers conducted a survey of her fellow employees’ views on the transfer policy, office morale, the need for a grievance committee, the level of confidence in supervisors, and whether employees felt pressured to work in political campaigns. Connick was informed by one of his assistants that Myers was creating a “mini-insurrection” in the office. Connick terminated Myers due to her refusal to accept the transfer, and because he believed her distribution of the questionnaire to be an act of insubordination. Myers challenged her termination in federal district court on the ground that it violated the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech. The district court held for Myers, relying on the Supreme Court’s holding in Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968) that a “state cannot condition public employment on a basis that infringes the employee’s constitutionally protected interest in freedom of expression.” The court of appeals affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

Dissent (Brennan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership