Cook v. Downing
Oklahoma Court of Appeals
891 P.2d 611 (1994)
Bryan Downing (defendant) was a dentist who spent a small fraction of his time at work fitting and making dentures for patients. One of these patients, Iris Cook (plaintiff), brought suit against Downing in small-claims court, alleging that she suffered from a painful condition because Downing had incorrectly fit her dentures. Downing argued that Cook’s symptoms were not of a kind that would be caused by the dentures. Evidence presented at trial failed to conclusively establish the reason for Cook’s pain, but did consistently exclude the fit of the dentures as the source of the pain. Nevertheless, the trial court found in favor of Cook and awarded her damages pursuant to sections 2-104, 2-105, and 2-351 of Article 2 of the Oklahoma Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Downing appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hunter, J.)
Dissent (Jones, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 684,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 684,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 42,700 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.