Cooper v. Pabst Brewing Co.
Delaware Court of Chancery
1993 WL 208763 (1993)
- Written by Brett Stavin, JD
Facts
Leading up to 1982, several firms attempted to acquire Pabst Brewing Company (Pabst) (defendant). One of those firms, G. Heilman Brewing Company (Heilman), eventually acquired Pabst through a two-tier tender offer. In the first phase of the merger, Heilman purchased 5.6 million shares of Pabst for $32 per share. In the second phase, Heilman acquired the remaining shares by converting them into a $24 subordinated debenture. After the two phases, Heilman’s purchases resulted in a blended cost equivalent to $29.50 per share. Cooper and other minority shareholders (collectively, Cooper) (plaintiffs) dissented from the merger and demanded a fair value appraisal of their shares. Cooper argued that the blended price from Heilman’s tender offer did not accurately reflect Pabst’s value and asserted that the fair market value should have been in the range of $45.72 to $51.71. Pabst claimed that the true fair market value was $20 per share. Pabst argued that the $29.50 blended price reflected a significant control premium.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hartnett, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.