Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C

Council for Urological Interests v. Burwell

790 F.3d 212 (2015)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Council for Urological Interests v. Burwell

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
790 F.3d 212 (2015)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 2008, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sylvia Burwell (secretary) (defendant) issued a new rule that prohibited all physicians from leasing medical equipment to a hospital using a per-use fee—i.e., per-click leases—if the physician refers patients to the hospital for procedures that involve the equipment. The secretary relied on the Stark Law for the authority to issue the rule, which was established to ensure physicians did not have financial incentives to refer patients for unnecessary procedures. Following the secretary’s rule, the Council for Urological Interests (council) (plaintiff) filed suit, alleging that the secretary’s issuance of the rule violated the equipment-rental-exception provision in the Stark Law. The district court granted the secretary’s motion to dismiss on the ground that the HHS regulations were entitled to deference under Chevron USA, Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). The council appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Griffith, Henderson, J.J.)

Dissent (Henderson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Healthcare Law

Key Terms