Cramer v. Crestar Financial Corp.

67 F.3d 294 (1995)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cramer v. Crestar Financial Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
67 F.3d 294 (1995)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

From 1985 to 1993, Thomas Cramer (plaintiff) worked for Continental Federal Savings Bank (Continental) as the director of information systems. In 1990 Continental decided to provide point-of-sale (POS) services to customers to help them facilitate purchases using credit cards. Cramer developed the POS software at his home, on his own computers, over several hundred hours, and was responsible for implementing Continental’s POS initiative. A final version of the POS software was created by another Continental employee using Cramer’s initial version. When Continental merged with Crestar Financial Corp. (Crestar) (defendant), Crestar paid Cramer to transfer the POS system to Crestar. However, Crestar did not offer to employ Cramer. Cramer then filed a copyright registration in the POS program and sued Crestar for copyright infringement. The district court granted Crestar’s motion for summary judgment and found that the software was a work made for hire. Cramer appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership