Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Cravotta v. Deggingers’ Foundry, Inc.

Kansas Court of Appeals
215 P.3d 636 (2010)


Facts

Mark Cravotta (plaintiff) hired Deggingers’ Foundry, Inc. (Degginger) (defendant) to make lighting fixtures for his mansion in exchange for $106,000. The parties executed a two-page contract that outlined their agreement. When Degginger did not deliver the fixtures on time, Cravotta sued Degginger for breach of contract, seeking to recover the $79,500 that he had already paid. While the suit was pending, Degginger made a partial delivery of the fixtures. The parties then reached a settlement that Degginger would: (1) deliver the remaining fixtures by April 2006, and (2) pay Cravotta $6000 for legal fees. However, Degginger failed to deliver the outstanding fixtures on time. Degginger alleged that Cravotta had breached the settlement agreement by failing to provide Degginger with essential information about the mansion’s electrical system. Degginger submitted evidence of communications between the parties requesting electrical information from Cravotta. Cravotta argued Degginger was the one who breached the settlement agreement. The district found for Cravotta, holding that the parties’ written contract did not expressly require Cravotta to provide Degginger with electrical information. Degginger appealed, arguing that the many exchanges between the parties regarding design, materials, and specifications, constituted a course of performance or course of dealing that modified the original contract and required Cravotta to provide electrical information. Therefore, when Cravotta failed to provide this vital information, Cravotta breached an unwritten contractual term.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Hill, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.