Crews v. W.A. Brown & Son, Inc.
North Carolina Court of Appeals
416 S.E.2d 924 (1992)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
Calvary Baptist Church (Calvary) (defendant) purchased a walk-in freezer from Foodcraft (defendant). Foodcraft purchased the parts for the freezer from the freezer’s manufacturer, W.A. Brown & Son, Inc. (Brown) (defendant). Foodcraft then assembled the walk-in freezer on-site at Calvary. The freezer’s door came pre-assembled with inside and outside releases. After assembly, Foodcraft tested the door latch and found that it worked properly. Several months later, Vickie Crews (Crews) (plaintiff) was volunteering at Calvary. Crews thought she heard a noise coming from the freezer, and she walked inside. The door closed behind her. Crews tried to open the freezer door using the inside release, but she could not trigger the latch. More than an hour passed before Crews was discovered in the freezer. She had suffered severe frostbite to her extremities, requiring the amputation of nine toes and several skin grafts. Crews sued Brown, Foodcraft, and Calvary. An expert witness opined that improper assembly of the freezer’s seal or latch had caused frost to accumulate on the door’s latch, preventing the latch from working correctly. Among other things, Crews alleged that Foodcraft breached the implied warranties of merchantability by selling and installing the freezer. Foodcraft filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Crews could not sue Foodcraft for these alleged breaches because Crews lacked contractual privity with Foodcraft. The trial court granted Foodcraft’s motion. Crews appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Greene, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.