Cudahy Junior Chamber of Commerce v. Quirk
Wisconsin Supreme Court
41 Wis. 2d 698 (1969)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
During a spirited public-referendum debate about fluoridating a community water supply, a leading opponent, James Quirk (defendant) offered $1,000 to the leading proponent, the Cudahy Junior Chamber of Commerce (the Jaycees) (plaintiff), if it could prove that fluoridation was safe. After some checking, the Jaycees declared victory and demanded payment. Quirk refused to pay. The Jaycees sued for misrepresentation and asked the court to find that fluoridation was in fact safe and award it $1,000. A jury found misrepresentation and judgment was entered for the Jaycees. Quirk appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hansen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.