Daniel v. State
Texas Court of Appeals
478 S.W.3d 773 (2015)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
David Daniel (defendant) aggressively raced David Cabrera on an urban, highly trafficked highway in Arlington, Texas. Jose Reyes-Ramirez was driving with Ruben Escalante as his passenger when Reyes-Ramirez turned left on an unprotected green light, meaning that the oncoming traffic also had a green light. After Reyes-Ramirez completed the turn, but while his car was still in the intersection, Cabrera’s oncoming car slammed into the passenger side of Reyes-Ramirez’s car at 80 miles per hour. Daniel, who raced into the intersection side-by-side with Cabrera, dodged around the accident and continued driving. Escalante’s pelvis was badly broken, and Reyes-Ramirez was killed. The State of Texas charged Daniel with two counts of racing on a highway resulting in serious injury or death, a second-degree felony. At trial, Daniel denied that he was racing and denied seeing the accident occur. The jury found Daniel guilty, and he was sentenced to 12 years in prison. Cabrera was separately convicted on manslaughter charges. Daniel appealed. On appeal, Daniel admitted to racing but argued that (1) his racing was neither the but-for cause nor the proximate cause of the deadly crash, (2) Cabrera’s conviction for manslaughter precluded Daniel’s liability for Reyes-Ramirez’s death, and (3) Reyes-Ramirez turning left in front of Cabrera was the direct cause of the crash.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Livingston, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.