David Tunick, Inc. v. Kornfeld
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
838 F. Supp. 848 (1993)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
David Tunick, Inc. (Tunick) (plaintiff) viewed, bid for, and purchased a specified printed artwork entitled Le Minotauromachie, signed by famed artist Pablo Picasso, from E.W. Kornfeld and his related art gallery (collectively, Kornfeld) (defendants). After accepting the print, Tunick learned that the Picasso signature was a forgery. Tunick immediately notified Kornfeld of Tunick’s belief that the signature was forged, demanded rescission of the sale, and tendered the print to Kornfeld. Shortly thereafter, Kornfeld offered to exchange the print for another print of Le Minotauromachie that had been signed by Picasso. Kornfeld believed the substitution would cure the initial nonconformity. Tunick sued Kornfeld, alleging breach of warranty and other claims. Kornfeld filed counterclaims, such as breach of contract. Kornfeld moved for summary judgment, arguing that Tunick could not prevail because even if the Picasso signature was forged on the first print, Tunick had refused to accept substitute conforming artwork as required under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Edelstein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.