Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education
United States Supreme Court
526 U.S. 629 (1999)

- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
LaShonda was a fifth-grade student at Hubbard Elementary School. LaShonda was sexually harassed by a fellow fifth-grade student on several occasions. The classmate attempted to touch her breasts and genital area, and made vulgar statements to her. LaShonda reported the harassment to her mother (plaintiff) and the school. The harassment continued for months and was reported to several school officials. School officials were also informed that the same classmate was harassing other students as well. The school did not take any action to investigate or discipline the classmate for a period of five months. The school also did not take any action to separate LaShonda and the classmate. The school did not have a policy in place to deal with student-on-student harassment. LaShonda’s mother sued the school district, the Monroe County Board of Education (defendant), for violating Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), 29 U.S.C. § 1681. The lawsuit sought monetary and injunctive relief. The trial court dismissed the lawsuit, holding that student-on-student harassment is not a ground for a private cause of action under Title IX. LaShonda’s mother appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which affirmed the trial court’s decision. LaShonda’s mother petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.