Supreme Court of Washington
270 P. 422 (1928)
Davison (plaintiff) was driving toward the city of Snohomish when he crossed a bridge at a low rate of speed. Davison lost control and his car skidded and struck a railing on the outer edge of the bridge. Davison’s car broke through the railing and fell to the ground. Davison and another plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damage to the car. Davison sued Snohomish County (the County) (defendant) for negligence. The County pleaded that Davison was guilty of contributory negligence. The trial resulted in a verdict for Davison and the other plaintiff. The County moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. Both motions were denied. The County appealed the judgment to the Supreme Court of Washington.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Beals, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.