Dempsey v. Associated Aviation Underwriters
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
141 F.R.D. 248 (1992)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Chester and Helen Dempsey (plaintiffs) sued Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) (defendant) in state court following a Cessna accident that injured Chester. The Dempseys were represented by an experienced aviation litigator, who was well known to Cessna and strongly disliked by Cessna’s insurer, Associated Aviation Underwriters (insurer) (defendant). Although Cessna had not yet met its nine-figure deductible and was paying for the lawsuit, the insurer was involved in the litigation. The case settled with Cessna paying the Dempseys $300,000. After the settlement was finalized, the Dempseys learned that one of the insurer’s employees (defendant) might have deliberately hidden a Cessna document during the lawsuit that Cessna had been required to disclose and that would have significantly raised the value of the Dempseys’ claim. The Dempseys did not give the $300,000 back to Cessna and ask to have the settlement agreement rescinded, i.e., undone. Instead, the Dempseys filed a new lawsuit against Cessna, the insurer, and the employee in federal court, seeking $25 million in damages for the allegedly deliberate fraud and dishonesty during the settlement process. Cessna, the insurer, and the employee filed motions to dismiss the claims. The insurer and the Dempseys’ attorney also each filed sanctions motions against each other, claiming that the other was making frivolous filings.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dalzell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.