Court of Appeals of New York
639 N.Y.S.2d 250 (1995)
Nancy Denny and her husband (plaintiff) filed suit in federal district court against Ford Motor Company (Ford) (defendant) after Nancy was severely injured when the Ford Bronco II she was driving rolled over in response to her slamming the brakes in order to avoid hitting a deer. Nancy asserted claims of negligence, strict products liability, and breach of implied warranty of merchantability. At trial, the Dennys presented evidence that the Bronco II’s high center of gravity, narrow track width, and short wheel base resulted in increased instability making it much more susceptible to rollovers. Ford countered that the Bronco II was never designed to serve as an on-the-road vehicle, but rather was made for off-road use over rugged terrain. Despite Ford’s claims, the Dennys introduced a Ford marketing manual which predicted that the Bronco II would be well regarded by suburban consumers and city commuters. At the close of the evidence, the district court told the jury that, with respect to the strict products liability claim, a manufacturer is liable for injury caused by its product when was used as intended or in a reasonably foreseeable manner. With respect to the breach of implied warranty claim, the court told the jury that if the Bronco II was not reasonably fit to be used for its intended purpose, the warranty had been breached. The jury held for Ford on the strict products liability claim, but in favor of the Dennys on the implied warranty claim and awarded $1.2 million in damages. Ford appealed. The court of appeals certified a question to the Court of Appeals of New York, namely whether, under state law, an action for implied warranty of merchantability was the same as an action based on strict products liability.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Titone, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.