Deramus v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company

92 F.3d 274 (1996)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Deramus v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
92 F.3d 274 (1996)

Facts

In January 1988, Frank Deramus and his wife, Jody Deramus (plaintiff), applied for life-insurance policies with Jackson National Life Insurance Company (Jackson) (defendant). Frank and Jody underwent blood and urine tests in accord with Jackson’s policy requiring such tests and denying coverage to anyone testing positive for HIV. In April 1988, the laboratory that tested Jody and Frank informed Jackson that Frank had tested positive for HIV. Jackson sent Frank a letter informing him that his application was rejected but not that the reason was a positive HIV test. Two years later, Frank tested positive for HIV. In April 1991, when Frank’s condition had deteriorated, Frank sent a letter to Jackson asking that his 1988 test results be sent to his physician. Jackson sent the results, confirming that Frank had tested positive for HIV in 1988. Frank died several days later. Jody sued Jackson on her own behalf and on behalf of Frank’s estate (plaintiff) as administratrix, alleging that Jackson had breached its duty to her and to Frank to inform them or Frank’s physician of Frank’s HIV-positive test. Specifically, Jody argued that Jackson created a confidential relationship with Jody and Frank when they demanded and retained access to confidential medical results. Jody also maintained that by requiring Jody and Frank to submit to medical tests, Jackson had assumed a duty to act reasonably and with due care. Both Jody and Jackson submitted motions for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wingate, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership