Deutsche Bank v. Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc. (In re Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc.)
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
416 F.3d 136 (2005)
- Written by Solveig Singleton, JD
Facts
Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc. (Metromedia) (debtor) filed for bankruptcy and proposed a reorganization plan (plan). The plan settled the claims of the Kluge Trust (Kluge) (creditor) against Metromedia. Kluge forgave $150 million in unsecured claims and converted $15.7 million in senior secured claims into equity in reorganized entities to be created by the plan (reorganized debtors). Kluge agreed to invest about $12 million in the reorganized debtors and to buy up to $25 million of the reorganized debtors’ stock. Kluge was to receive about 11 percent of the reorganized debtors’ common stock. Also, the bankruptcy court was asked to enjoin all claims against Kluge arising from its dealings with Metromedia (release). In March 2003, the bankruptcy court granted the release, stating that Kluge had made a material contribution to the plan, and confirmed the plan. In March 2004, a United States district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s order. Deutsche Bank London Branch (DB) (creditor) and Bear, Stearns & Company, Inc. (Bear Stearns) (creditor) appealed, arguing that the United States Bankruptcy Code did not empower the bankruptcy court to release Kluge. DB and Bear Stearns did not ask that the reorganization be stayed or expedite their appeal. Before the appeal was heard, many transactions contemplated by the plan were completed, including the issue of the reorganized debtors’ stock, the estate’s receipt of Kluge’s contribution, and the entry of a reorganized debtor firm into contracts necessary for its operations. On appeal, DB and Bear Stearns argued that the appellate court could create a remedy without disrupting the plan by allowing their claims against Kluge despite the release.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.