Dioxin/Organochlorine Center v. Environmental Protection Agency

57 F.3d 1517 (1995)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dioxin/Organochlorine Center v. Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
57 F.3d 1517 (1995)

Facts

In the 1980s, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) discovered high levels of tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), a toxic pollutant, in fish from the Columbia River basin. Studies confirmed that a significant source of the TCDD found in the fish was the pulp and paper mills (the mills) (plaintiff) upstream from the fish. The EPA determined that the concentration of TCDD in the water exceeded the permissible level of 0.013 parts per quadrillion (ppq) set by the states regulating the water quality in the Columbia River Basin. The EPA further determined that the activity of the mills was a major reason for the high TCDD concentration. In addition, the Columbia River Basin states determined that the levels of TCDD discharged into the river violated the states’ water quality standards, and designated the Columbia River as water quality limited, pursuant to the Clean Water Act (CWA). As a result of these findings, as well as the states’ designations, the EPA issued a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for TCDD discharge into the Columbia River. A TDML limits the total amount of a pollutant that can be discharged into a body of water from all sources. The EPA interpreted the act as giving it authority to establish TMDLs even without first establishing technology-based effluent limitations for TCDD. The mills challenged the TDML, arguing that the CWA requires the EPA to first establish less burdensome technology-based limitations before establishing a TDML.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Leavy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership