DISH Network Corp. v. DBSD North America, Inc. (DISH I)
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
421 B.R. 133 (2009)

- Written by Solveig Singleton, JD
Facts
DBSD North America, Inc. (DBSD) (debtor) began to develop a satellite communications system, acquiring a satellite and the necessary wireless spectrum licenses. DISH Network Corporation (DISH) (creditor) provided satellite television service. DISH’s investments included a satellite-based communication service that competed directly with that of DBSD. DBSD filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition and proposed a reorganization plan (the plan). The plan recognized $40 million in debt held by creditors in the first lien debt class. In July 2009, DISH purchased all the claims in the first lien debt class at par. DISH also bought $111 million in claims in the second lien debt class at par. DISH’s internal documents stated that its intention in buying the claims was to obtain a strategic opportunity, to control the bankruptcy process for strategic assets, and to acquire control of DBSD. DISH used all its first and second lien claims to vote to reject the plan. DBSD asked the bankruptcy court to have DISH disqualified from voting for lack of good faith. DISH objected, noting that it behaved appropriately and had not offered its own plan. The next day, DISH offered its own reorganization plan.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gerber, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.