Doe v. Superior Court

36 Cal. App. 5th 199 (2019)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Doe v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal
36 Cal. App. 5th 199 (2019)

KD

Facts

Jane Doe (plaintiff) worked in the campus police department at Southwestern College. Doe sued Southwestern Community College District (district) (defendant), campus police officer Ricardo Suarez (defendant), and two other district employees (defendants) for sexual assault and sexual harassment. Doe alleged that Suarez had also sexually harassed two other female district employees, one of whom was Andrea P. Allegations regarding Suarez’s harassment of other employees was presumably relevant to Doe’s claim because Suarez’s conduct placed the district on notice. Doe’s attorney, Manuel Corrales Jr., contacted Andrea P., who was still a district employee, about Suarez’s alleged harassment. Although the district offered to represent Andrea P., there was no evidence that she had accepted that offer or that she had retained other counsel at the time Corrales contacted her. Upon learning of this contact, the district, Suarez, and the two other district employees moved to disqualify Corrales, arguing that Corrales violated California Rule of Professional Conduct 4.2, which generally prohibited an attorney from communicating with a person whom the attorney knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter. The trial court granted the disqualification motion. Doe petitioned the court of appeal for a writ of mandate.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dato, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership