Dolphin & Bradbury, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission

512 F.3d 634 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dolphin & Bradbury, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
512 F.3d 634 (2008)

Facts

Dolphin & Bradbury, Inc. (Dolphin) (defendant), a broker-dealer, acted as the underwriter for the Dauphin County General Authority (DCGA) in the purchase of Forum Place, an office building. In July 1998, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) occupied Forum Place for what was to be a temporary period, with the lease expiring in November 2001. Key participants for DCGA were informed on June 30, 1998, without guarantees, that the state government planned on using Forum Place after PennDOT’s departure. Robert J. Bradbury (defendant), the chief executive officer of Dolphin, was informed of the government’s intended use. Bradbury relied on information regarding that use to assure potential investors. However, Bradbury failed to disclose information regarding PennDOT’s departure in the key disclosure document and claimed that the lease rates would continue until at least 2008. The information was also only available in the public domain through a newspaper article and a discussion that occurred in a public DCGA meeting. By 2000, 55 percent of Forum Place lay vacant, and bondholders forced Forum Place into receivership in 2003. Bradbury was found by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) to have violated various securities laws and regulations by acting with scienter in the failure to disclose. Bradbury appealed the SEC’s order.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership