Donohoe v. Consolidated Operating & Production Corp.

30 F.3d 907 (1994)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Donohoe v. Consolidated Operating & Production Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
30 F.3d 907 (1994)

Facts

Terrence Donohoe (plaintiff) alleged that Consolidated Operating & Production Corporation (COPCO) (defendant) had fraudulently lured Donohoe into an investment. The investment involved drilling for oil in land that COPCO knew contained no oil. Donohoe joined COPCO’s principals and shareholders, Jack Nortman, Morando Berrettini, and Dennis Bridges, as defendants. Nortman and Berrettini had conducted a thorough check of Bridges’s background and expertise and had also regularly checked up on Bridges’s work. Additionally, Nortman and Berrettini had invested over $100,000 of their own personal funds into the venture. During the course of litigation, Bridges declared bankruptcy, such that judgments against Bridges contained little value. Nortman, Berrettini, and COPCO were left as the only defendants. Donohoe’s complaint argued for liability on various theories, including violation of the antifraud and registration requirements of federal securities laws. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Nortman, Berrettini, and COPCO. However, on appeal, the court of appeals noted that the district court’s opinion had failed to address the argument that Nortman and Berrettini could be liable for Bridges’s fraudulent behavior under a control-person theory. The case was remanded to the district court for discussion of this issue. The district court again granted summary judgment for Nortman and Berrettini, finding that the defendants had met the good-faith defense for controlling persons. Donohoe appealed again.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cudahy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 734,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 734,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 734,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership