Dos Santos v. Coleta

987 N.E.2d 1187 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dos Santos v. Coleta

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
987 N.E.2d 1187 (2013)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Maria and Jose Coleta (the Coletas) (defendants) set up a trampoline next to an inflatable swimming pool in their backyard. Disregarding the manufacturer’s warning not to jump or dive into the pool, Jose Coleta put a ladder in the pool to enable people to climb from the pool to the trampoline and jump into the pool. Jose knew it might be dangerous but thought it would be fun. Cleber Dos Santos (plaintiff) rented a unit in the Coletas’ two-family home. Dos Santos flipped into the pool from the trampoline and landed on his head, resulting in fractured vertebrae and paralysis. Dos Santos sued the Coletas for negligently putting the trampoline next to the pool and failing to warn him of the danger of jumping from the trampoline into the pool. The court instructed the jury that a landowner is not obligated to protect visitors against open and obvious dangers on his property but declined to give an instruction regarding the circumstances in which a landowner may be liable for injuries resulting from open and obvious dangers. The jury found in favor of the Coletas. The appeals court affirmed, and the supreme judicial court granted Dos Santos’s application for further review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cordy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership