Dow Jones & Company, Inc. v. Gutnick
Australia High Court
[2002] HCA 56 (Austl.) (2002)
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
Dow Jones and Company, Inc. (Dow Jones) (defendant) published the Wall Street Journal, Barron’s magazine, and WSJ.com. WSJ.com included Barron’s Online, which reproduced the current edition of Barron’s magazine. Dow Jones’s editorial offices were in New York but material for publication was uploaded onto servers at offices in New Jersey. An edition of Barron’s Online included an article referring to Joseph Gutnick (plaintiff). Gutnick lived in Victoria, Australia, and his business headquarters were there as well, although he also conducted business in other countries. Gutnick sued Dow Jones for damages in the Victoria Supreme Court, arguing that the article defamed him. Dow Jones filed an appeal arguing that Victoria was an inappropriate forum for the action because the statements were published in New Jersey.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gleeson, C.J., and McHugh, Gummow, and Hayne, JJ.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.