Educational Credit Management Corporation v. Jesperson
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
571 F.3d 775 (2009)
- Written by Ryan Hill, JD
Facts
Mark Jesperson (plaintiff) owed one of his creditors, Educational Credit Management Corporation (ECMC), over $300,000 for student loans. Jesperson also owed over $50,000 in student loans to other creditors. Jesperson had not repaid any part of these loans. Jesperson made approximately $4,000 per month in gross income and estimated that he was likely in an income-tax bracket of 33 percent. Jesperson lived with his brother rent-free, but Jesperson estimated that his rent should have cost $500 per month. Jesperson was eligible for a Department of Education Income Contingent Repayment plan (ICRP) that would allow him to repay these debts in payments that could vary annually based on his income. Jesperson petitioned for chapter 7 bankruptcy, seeking an undue-hardship discharge for his student-loan debts. The bankruptcy court accepted Jesperson’s tax-bracket and future housing cost estimates and concluded that he had no surplus income. The bankruptcy court ruled that Jesperson had an undue hardship and discharged his loans. The district court affirmed. ECMC appealed the final judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Loken, C.J.)
Concurrence (Smith, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Bye, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.