Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. United States

607 F.3d 836 (2010)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

607 F.3d 836 (2010)

Facts

On August 20, 1998, in response to the Osama bin Laden terrorist network’s bombing of the United States embassies in Africa, the United States launched missile attacks against a factory in Sudan believed to be connected with the bin Laden network and involved in the production of materials used for chemical weapons. El-Shifa (plaintiff), the owner of the plant (plaintiff), and Salah El Din Ahmed Mohammed Idris (Idris) (plaintiff), the owner of El-Shifa, contended that: (1) striking the plant was a mistake, (2) the plant was not a weapons facility, and (3) the plant was not in any way associated with terrorism or bin Laden’s network. The plaintiffs brought an action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia based on negligence and international law claims, after the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) denied their requests for compensation for the plant’s destruction and a withdrawal of the U.S. government’s (defendant) allegations that they were involved with terrorism. The district court ruled in favor of the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on sovereign immunity, stating that the complaint probably presented a nonjusticiable political question. El-Shifa appealed based on law of nations and defamation claims, and a divided panel affirmed the district court, holding that the claims were barred by the political question doctrine. The panel’s judgment was vacated, and a rehearing was ordered.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Griffith, J.)

Concurrence (Kavanaugh, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership