Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Enright v. Groves

Colorado Court of Appeals
56 P.2d 851 (1977)


Facts

Groves (defendant), a police officer, saw a dog running loose in violation of the city’s dog leash ordinance. The dog was running towards Mrs. Enright’s (plaintiff) home. Groves came up to the home where he encountered Enright’s eleven year old son and asked him if it was his dog. The boy said yes and told him his mother was sitting in the car parked at the curb by the house. Groves told the boy to put the dog inside the house and Groves walked towards the car. Groves asked Enright for her driver’s license, which she refused to produce. Groves told her to show her license or go to jail. Groves thereafter arrested Enright and charged her with violation of the dog leash ordinance. There is no city ordinance that requires Enright to produce her license on demand. As a result of this incident Enright was later convicted of violation of the dog leash ordinance. Enright sued Groves and the city and won a judgment in her favor. Groves and the city appealed the judgment to the Colorado Court of Appeals. 

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 238,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.