Estate of Edgar v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
74 T.C. 983 (1980)
Facts
When Clara Edgar died, her will transferred her entire estate to a trust set up by her deceased sister, Jean Vaughan. The trust’s income would first be distributed to four individuals in specified monthly amounts for life. The trust’s remaining income would be distributed to multiple organizations that all qualified for charitable deductions under 26 U.S.C. § 2055. At the time of Edgar’s death, the principal in Vaughan’s trust already generated enough income to make the monthly payments to the individual life tenants. When Edgar’s estate (plaintiff) filed its federal estate tax return, it deducted the entire amount that it had transferred into the trust. The estate claimed that, as a practical matter, none of Edgar’s estate would be needed to make the monthly payments to the nonqualifying individual recipients. Thus, Edgar’s entire transfer would be used only to make payments to the qualifying charities and was deductible. Alternatively, the estate argued that the monetary value of the individuals’ life estates could be ascertained using actuarial tables (that estimated the individuals’ likely lifespans). The estate was willing to sever that ascertainable, noncharitable amount from the overall asset transfer and pay estate taxes on that portion. The federal government (defendant) denied the estate any charitable deduction. The estate petitioned for a determination that it could claim a partial or full charitable deduction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Irwin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 705,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,300 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.