Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Estate of Lauder v. Commissioner

64 T.C.M. 1643 (1992)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...

Estate of Lauder v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

64 T.C.M. 1643 (1992)

Facts

Joseph and Estee Lauder and their two sons, Leonard and Ronald, were the only shareholders of a private cosmetic company. The Lauders considered the company’s nonpublic, family nature to be necessary to its continued success. In order to keep the company family-owned, the Lauders entered into consecutive restrictive stockholder agreements. The latest agreement was a first-offer agreement stating that if a family member decided to sell stock or died, the member’s shares would be offered for sale to the remaining family members and the company at a set price before the shares could be sold to anyone else. The agreement’s set price was the company’s book value less value added by the company’s intangible assets. However, much of the company’s value came from its intangible assets, and similar cosmetic companies were selling for two or three times their book values. When Joseph died, the company bought his stock at the tangibles-only book value of approximately $4,100 per share. Joseph’s estate (plaintiff) valued the stock at $4,300 per share on its estate-tax return. The federal government (defendant) valued the shares at $13,250 each and assessed an additional $42 million in estate taxes. The estate petitioned the United States Tax Court for relief, arguing that the agreement’s price was the stock’s value because the estate could not sell the stock for a higher amount.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hamblen, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership