Ex parte Young
United States Supreme Court
209 U.S. 123 (1908)
The State of Minnesota enacted legislation regulating railroad rates. If a railroad company charged rates in excess of the approved amount, its officers and employees were subject to misdemeanor or felony convictions, fines, and potentially lengthy jail sentences. The shareholders of multiple railroad companies (plaintiffs) brought suit in federal circuit court, alleging that the law violated the due process rights guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs sued the railroad companies to prevent them from complying with the legislation. The action also sought an injunction against the attorney general of Minnesota, Edward Young (defendant), to prevent him from enforcing the legislation. Young filed a motion to dismiss based on the Eleventh Amendment prohibition against private actions against states. The circuit court dismissed Young’s motion and entered a preliminary injunction to prevent Young from enforcing the law. Young then filed a state court action to enforce the legislation against the railroads. The circuit court held Young in contempt, and he filed petitions for writs of habeas corpus and certiorari in the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Peckham, J.)
Dissent (Harlan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.