From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
F.W. Woolworth v. Kirby
Alabama Supreme Court
302 So. 2d 67 (1974)
A Woolco store in Huntsville, Alabama, planned a promotional event in which an airplane would drop ping-pong balls into the parking lot behind the store. Each ping-pong ball, when redeemed inside Woolco, would entitle its finder to a prize. Prizes ranged from ice cream cones to televisions. Woolco advertised the event heavily. On the morning of the scheduled ping-pong drop, there were approximately 4,500 people gathered in Woolco’s parking lot. The plane made three passes over the parking lot, dropping 1/3 of the balls with each pass. Between the second and third drop, Lona Kirby (plaintiff) and her grandson entered the crowd in the parking lot. Kirby was 70 years old. Shortly thereafter, the pilot made his third pass, dropping the remaining ping-pong balls. As the crowd dashed for the bouncing balls, Kirby was knocked down and run over by some of the attendees. Kirby’s hip was broken in the stampede. Some other members of the crowd suffered minor injuries, too. Kirby sued F.W. Woolworth Company (Woolworth) (defendant) for negligence alleging, among other theories of liability, that the store had failed to police or control the crowd that had gathered for the promotion. A jury found in favor of Kirby, determining that Woolco owed a duty of reasonable care to Kirby and negligently failed to take steps to protect her and other members of the crowd, such as by policing the crowd with Woolco personnel. The jury awarded Kirby $52,500 in damages. Woolworth appealed, arguing that the trial court improperly charged the jury regarding whether Woolworth owed Kirby a duty of care to protect her from the acts of other store patrons.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Heflin, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 516,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 516,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.