Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. Evans
Kansas Court of Appeals
637 P.2d 491 (1981)
- Written by Genan Zilkha, JD
Facts
David and Karen Evans (plaintiffs) were attending a going-away party held in their honor. The party had kegs of beer and bonfires. During the party, it started to rain. Damon Rose parked his family station wagon so that it faced the bonfire. The station wagon had three seats. One of the back seats faced the station wagon’s rear window. Mike Ehinger was sitting in that seat. Ehinger, with the help of Damon Rose’s wife, Kathy Rose, and Danny Ireland, threw an explosive device out the back of the station wagon. The device landed in Karen Evans’ beer and exploded. She suffered extensive injuries. The Evanses sued Kathy Rose, Ehinger, and Ireland. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. (Farm Bureau) (defendant) insured the Rose automobile. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. (Farmers) (defendant) insured Ehinger’s automobile. Both policies covered bodily injury arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of an insured automobile. The trial court granted summary judgment against Farm Bureau and Farmers and determined that Farm Bureau and Farmers were required to cover Karen Evans’ injuries. The trial court determined that Karen Evans’ injuries were covered because the Rose station wagon was being used as a shelter, and using a car as a shelter is a reasonable use of the car, which was contemplated by the parties to the insurance contract. Farm Bureau and Farmers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Abbott, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.