Farris v. Glen Alden Corporation
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
143 A.2d 25 (1958)
Glen Alden Corporation (Glen Alden) (defendant), a coal mining company, and List Industries Corporation (List), a holding company with interests ranging from theatres to textile companies to real estate, entered into a “reorganization agreement” which was subject to stockholder approval and provided that (1) Glen Alden would acquire List’s assets; (2) Glen Alden would issue over 3 million shares of stock to List’s shareholders; (3) Glen Alden would assume all of List’s debt; (4) Glen Alden would change its name to List Alden; (5) List would be dissolved; and (6) List Alden would carry on the business of both corporations. Under the agreement, stock in List Alden would only be worth $21 per share, as opposed to $38 per share, the value of Glen Alden stock. The agreement was approved at the next Glen Alden annual meeting. Farris (plaintiff), a Glen Alden shareholder, brought suit, seeking to enjoin the “reorganization” on the grounds that notice of the meeting was insufficient in that it did not disclose a merger as the true purpose of the meeting, did not give shareholders notice of their right to dissent and invoke their appraisal rights, and did not contain a copy of certain parts of the Business Corporation Law as was required. Glen Alden admitted to all of the claims and moved for summary judgment on the theory that the transaction was merely a purchase of corporate assets and so Farris did not state a claim on which relief could be granted. The trial court denied the motion, found that the transaction was a de facto merger, and therefore found that the notice was insufficient and granted Farris injunctive relief. Glen Alden appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cohen, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 706,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 706,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,400 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.