Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs
United States Supreme Court
259 U.S. 200 (1922)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
The Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. (Baltimore) (plaintiff) was the sole surviving member of the Federal League of Professional Base Ball Clubs (federal league), which tried to compete with the two established major leagues—the National League of Professional Base Ball Clubs and the American League of Professional Base Ball Clubs (collectively, major league baseball) (defendants). Baltimore sued major league baseball and others for violating federal antitrust law. The trial court ruled in Baltimore’s favor. Major league baseball appealed. The court of appeals reversed, reasoning that the business of major league baseball was to present baseball games to the public and that such games were purely intrastate matters (rather than interstate commerce) and thus not within the Sherman Act’s ambit. Baltimore appealed to the United States Supreme Court, arguing that major league baseball involved interstate commerce because its business was presenting games between teams from different cities and states, which required the clubs to engage in extensive travel organized, controlled, and paid for by the clubs.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Holmes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.