Felger v. Nichols

370 A.2d 141 (1977)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Felger v. Nichols

Maryland Court of Special Appeals
370 A.2d 141 (1977)

Play video

Facts

Milton R. Felger (plaintiff) hired Zane G. Nichols (defendant) to represent him in a divorce. A dispute arose, and Felger refused to pay $345 in legal fees. Nichols sued Felger in the District Court of Maryland on June 21, 1974 to recover the $345. At trial, Felger argued that the fees were unreasonable, because Nichols’s services were unsatisfactory. The court found in favor of Nichols. In a separate action, Felger filed suit against Nichols for legal malpractice. Nichols filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that the earlier trial court had considered Felger’s malpractice claims and found in Nichols’s favor. Thus, Nichols argued that Felger was collaterally estopped from raising the malpractice claim in the second lawsuit. Felger argued that he was not permitted to litigate the malpractice issue in the previous case due to the jurisdictional limits of the first court and the judge’s error sustaining a single objection. Summary judgment was entered in Nichols’s favor. Felger appealed to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Davidson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership